I believe that instead of this being from the veiw it is at, it should be from a 1st person view so i just want to announce this and hope we get some improvements on this when we get updates.

I think i have heard an idea of letting the host set the game to were no TV is allowed but i only think this might start up some fights and disagreements so lets not do this, unless there are just tons of people wanting this and fine with it then ya go ahead and do it do what the people ask.

TV from the first person view eh, i wonder where you got that idea from 

oh idk haha

well you mentioned it and it sounded great so i figured id post it to get the idea really out there


Oh - ALL CREDIT FOR INVENTING THIS SHOULD GO TO HASKY79 lol happy?

Heh thanks, but i got the idea from another flight sim so really the credit should go to whoever first invented it, i wonder what was the first flight sim to use a Target View system.

Well, to tell the truth the credit would go to the Devs, give me a day or two and I'll go dig up one or two of the posts of what they wanted to do with it. But I know they had already planned something along that line. Which just means it's such a good idea that the Devs liked it before you even thought about it! They must be psychic! 

Well cool but uhh that darn problem remains about the money issues and the other problems that stand in the way of updates but as soon as that problem is solved i would love to have this edited.

Ya know there's gotta be at least 1 AoA player whos loaded with money, just send it all to the Mad Otters.

Rumor has it that Mad Otter bought the right to RB3D RB2 the whole thing.
But they can't get AoA new stuff..
oh well, lifes a beech..
word came from AAA IL2 site.
I got it 2nd handed.

   

*Quoted feloneousX's post to LadyOtter*
[17:37] <@Chi-Ro> trufax or lies?
[17:37] <@LadyOtter> they can't get AoA new stuff because GG/IA won't pay us
[17:38] <@LadyOtter> we can't work for nothing
[17:38] <@BeefThief> .....
[17:38] <@LadyOtter> yes, we have the rights to Red Baron
[17:38] <@BeefThief> so it's an IA issue right now?
[17:38] <@LadyOtter> (check the website)
[17:38] <@LadyOtter> yes, it always has been
[17:38] <@LadyOtter> they want to do new AoA stuff
[17:38] <@LadyOtter> but no funding
[17:38] <@BeefThief> lol
[17:38] <@LadyOtter> (see forums)
[17:38] <@BeefThief> do they know this?
[17:38] <@LadyOtter> does IA know it?
[17:38] <@LadyOtter> er, yes
[17:38] <@BeefThief> well
[17:39] <@LadyOtter> pretty sure it's been discussed
[17:39] <@LadyOtter> maybe not
[17:39] <@LadyOtter> but about 90% sure
[17:39] <@BeefThief> that's kinda sad
[17:39] <@LadyOtter> it is
[17:39] <@LadyOtter> D:
[17:39] <@BeefThief> "Hey, make some new AoA stuff"
[17:39] <@BeefThief> "We need money first"
[17:39] <@BeefThief> "Okay"
[17:39] <@LadyOtter> "NOES!"
[17:39] <@BeefThief> quiet ensues
[17:39] <@LadyOtter> if you guys request new stuff
[17:39] <@LadyOtter> that'd be the only way
[17:40] <@BeefThief> THEY'VE BEEN REQUESTING NEW STUFF
[17:40] <@LadyOtter> :S
[17:40] <@BeefThief> exactly

LadyOtter = InternOtter = The Mad Otter intern
BeefThief = GameThief = IA player/tester and a tester for a MO game.
Chi-Ro = Chi-Ro = Chi-Ro

That link is the Mad Otter IRC page where we all hang:
http://webchat.quakenet.org/?nick=&channels=madotter

 

We know what this means, more advertising to generate revenue     

lol chi ro = chi ro = chi ro

back to topic, so is there some kind of battle between IA and madotter as of who holds aoa and who updates and those certain matters

Meh idk anymore, I've given up trying to figure IA out.

 Like I have stated once before, it is an IA issue. Thanks Chi for posting that. My point has been made when everyone was onto me about it, with they were stating it is not being IA problem.

                     ~S~ GGB

Meh, the blame gets shifted back and forth all the time. In the end it's still a money problem no matter whos money it is. IA/GG/MO none of them have the money just throw into a game update just like that.


Problem solved.

Who'd you find?